<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Encirca Domain News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.encirca.com/domain-news</link>
	<description>Specializing in .PRO and .TRAVEL Domain Names</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:16:36 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on EnCirca President Serving on ICANN Panel for new gTLDs by The .PRO Discussion - Page 117 - NamePros.com</title>
		<link>http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/2011/encirca-president-serving-on-icann-panel-for-new-gtlds/comment-page-1/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>The .PRO Discussion - Page 117 - NamePros.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/?p=665#comment-907</guid>
		<description>[...] the president of Encirca will be at this conference and a member of the ICANN panel for new TLDS.   http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/2...for-new-gtlds/   __________________ Videos.pro &#124; Gamble.pro &#124; Military.pro &#124; Telecom.pro &#124; Value.pro &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the president of Encirca will be at this conference and a member of the ICANN panel for new TLDS.   <a href="http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/2...for-new-gtlds/" rel="nofollow">http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/2&#8230;for-new-gtlds/</a>   __________________ Videos.pro | Gamble.pro | Military.pro | Telecom.pro | Value.pro | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ICANN Approves .XXX and Sets Date for new TLDs. by Kerry</title>
		<link>http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/2011/icann-approves-xxx-and-sets-date-for-new-tlds/comment-page-1/#comment-900</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/?p=621#comment-900</guid>
		<description>Sounds like good news for .Pro and other alternate existing .gtld extensions. With .pro already established with 100K+ registrants and till 2013 (almost 2 years away) for new extensions. This will provide plenty of time for existing established extensions to get more established. 

I&#039;ve always been a little wary of new extensions coming onto the market as it is difficult to maintain and create an extension let alone get a large registry base needed to support one.  Let alone find a short extension such as .pro that has the ability to enhance many keywords while providing a strong brand! I read this as great news for existing domain owners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like good news for .Pro and other alternate existing .gtld extensions. With .pro already established with 100K+ registrants and till 2013 (almost 2 years away) for new extensions. This will provide plenty of time for existing established extensions to get more established. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always been a little wary of new extensions coming onto the market as it is difficult to maintain and create an extension let alone get a large registry base needed to support one.  Let alone find a short extension such as .pro that has the ability to enhance many keywords while providing a strong brand! I read this as great news for existing domain owners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on .Pro in the wild &#8211; elive.pro a start-up to watch by kerry</title>
		<link>http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/2011/pro-in-the-wild-elive-pro-a-start-up-to-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-899</link>
		<dc:creator>kerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 05:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/?p=614#comment-899</guid>
		<description>Really interesting idea. Another video streaming realted .pro site to watch is &lt;a href=&quot;www.filmmaker.pro&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FilmMaker.pro&lt;/a&gt; which is a good one to check out. Its always good to see new web development within the .pro extension!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting idea. Another video streaming realted .pro site to watch is <a href="www.filmmaker.pro" rel="nofollow">FilmMaker.pro</a> which is a good one to check out. Its always good to see new web development within the .pro extension!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Universe.jobs aims to teach job seekers to use direct navigation for their job search. by Tweets that mention Encirca Domain News » Universe.jobs aims to teach job seekers to use direct navigation for their job search. -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/2011/universe-jobs-aims-to-teach-job-seekers-to-use-direct-navigation-for-their-job-search/comment-page-1/#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Encirca Domain News » Universe.jobs aims to teach job seekers to use direct navigation for their job search. -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/?p=606#comment-894</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Deanna Morre, EnCirca. EnCirca said: Universe.jobs aims to teach job seekers to use direct navigation for their job search. http://dlvr.it/H2wsp [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Deanna Morre, EnCirca. EnCirca said: Universe.jobs aims to teach job seekers to use direct navigation for their job search. <a href="http://dlvr.it/H2wsp" rel="nofollow">http://dlvr.it/H2wsp</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dot-CO domains for just $11.99 &#8211; this week only from EnCirca by Tweets that mention Encirca Domain News » Dot-CO domains for just $11.99 – this week only from EnCirca -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/2011/dot-co-domains-for-just-11-99-this-week-only-from-encirca/comment-page-1/#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Encirca Domain News » Dot-CO domains for just $11.99 – this week only from EnCirca -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 22:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/?p=597#comment-893</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by HAMZA LABBACI, EnCirca. EnCirca said: Dot-CO domains for just $11.99 – this week only from EnCirca http://dlvr.it/FwC9K [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by HAMZA LABBACI, EnCirca. EnCirca said: Dot-CO domains for just $11.99 – this week only from EnCirca <a href="http://dlvr.it/FwC9K" rel="nofollow">http://dlvr.it/FwC9K</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Submit your Questions for the Dot-Nxt Conference by Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/2011/submit-your-questions-for-the-dot-nxt-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-892</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/?p=591#comment-892</guid>
		<description>With the introduction of new domains on the market is ICANN going to do anything to level the playing field on existing extensions by removing registry requirements for extensions such as .PRO, .TRAVEL and .BIZ? Alot of people feel that restrictions are a negative towards growth in these extensions.

Therefore with an unlimited amount of extensions coming onto the market without restriction, is something going to be done to allow these existing .gtlds to play fairly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the introduction of new domains on the market is ICANN going to do anything to level the playing field on existing extensions by removing registry requirements for extensions such as .PRO, .TRAVEL and .BIZ? Alot of people feel that restrictions are a negative towards growth in these extensions.</p>
<p>Therefore with an unlimited amount of extensions coming onto the market without restriction, is something going to be done to allow these existing .gtlds to play fairly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some ideas for finance professionals to promote themselves via search engines. by Leonard Britt</title>
		<link>http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/2010/some-ideas-for-finance-professionals-to-promote-themselves-via-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-890</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard Britt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 03:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/?p=559#comment-890</guid>
		<description>Interesting concept - given my accounting/finance background I hold several investing and finance/accounting domains.  I suppose at some point I should try to develop one.  IMO .Pro would make more sense with say keywords such as TaxAccountant, FinancialAnalyst, Controller, CPA, Auditor, etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting concept &#8211; given my accounting/finance background I hold several investing and finance/accounting domains.  I suppose at some point I should try to develop one.  IMO .Pro would make more sense with say keywords such as TaxAccountant, FinancialAnalyst, Controller, CPA, Auditor, etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on .Pro dropping its prices in January by .Pro dropping its prices in January &#124; Lev Pershins Domain Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/2010/pro-dropping-its-prices-in-january/comment-page-1/#comment-888</link>
		<dc:creator>.Pro dropping its prices in January &#124; Lev Pershins Domain Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 04:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/?p=545#comment-888</guid>
		<description>[...] Read full [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read full [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Last day to sign-up for .Pro 3-letter auction by kerry</title>
		<link>http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/2010/last-day-to-sign-up-for-pro-3-letter-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-887</link>
		<dc:creator>kerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/?p=529#comment-887</guid>
		<description>Agreed. Ask.pro is excellent., but there are some other good ones. I could see dog, eco, tea (tea party) and dui competing for top auction result. All short and brandable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. Ask.pro is excellent., but there are some other good ones. I could see dog, eco, tea (tea party) and dui competing for top auction result. All short and brandable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ICANN&#8217;s Brave Decision &#8211; Who are the Winners and Losers? by Raj Alla</title>
		<link>http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/2010/icanns-brave-decision-who-are-the-winners-and-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-886</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Alla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.encirca.com/domain-news/?p=515#comment-886</guid>
		<description>I thought this is useful to see from a different prospect. Experts, please help me answer the below questions.

Registry:
1. This decision is good because, now the registry owners don’t need to depend on the registrar to put registrar marketing dollar, resources and place it in the top in their list to SELL more domains.
Now new TLD owners can build their own registrar (build new or buy an existing one) and sell more domains, pump more resources and makerketing dollars to be successful…This will get us lot of innovation because registries can spend more money in registrars…..
Q1: ISN’T THIS TRUE?

Registrar :
Small: No difference
Big : They can build a successful new TLD by going thru their own channel like eNom. 

But current registrars have threat from registries to enter in to this registrar business…
Q2: is this true?

Q3: If Enom applies for a TLD, do you guys think
other small registrars or godaddy does not want to sell that TLD?

Domainer: They do the same as current …buy more names and make more money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this is useful to see from a different prospect. Experts, please help me answer the below questions.</p>
<p>Registry:<br />
1. This decision is good because, now the registry owners don’t need to depend on the registrar to put registrar marketing dollar, resources and place it in the top in their list to SELL more domains.<br />
Now new TLD owners can build their own registrar (build new or buy an existing one) and sell more domains, pump more resources and makerketing dollars to be successful…This will get us lot of innovation because registries can spend more money in registrars…..<br />
Q1: ISN’T THIS TRUE?</p>
<p>Registrar :<br />
Small: No difference<br />
Big : They can build a successful new TLD by going thru their own channel like eNom. </p>
<p>But current registrars have threat from registries to enter in to this registrar business…<br />
Q2: is this true?</p>
<p>Q3: If Enom applies for a TLD, do you guys think<br />
other small registrars or godaddy does not want to sell that TLD?</p>
<p>Domainer: They do the same as current …buy more names and make more money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

